The Robert Paisola Live World News Feed

Showing posts with label consolidated resorts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consolidated resorts. Show all posts

7/19/2009

Consolidated Resorts Seeks Bankruptcy - HERE IS THE INFORMATION , Robert Paisola Reports


CONSOLIDATED RESORTS CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY FILED IN LAS VEGAS NEVADA
CASE 09-22035-lbr
CHAPTER 7 NO ASSETS
CONSOLIDATED RESORTS, INC
801 SOUTH RAMPART BLVD SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89145

09-22035-lbr CONSOLIDATED RESORTS, INC.
Case type: bk Chapter: 7 Asset: No Vol: v Judge: LINDA B. RIEGLE
Date filed: 07/07/2009 Date of last filing: 07/17/2009



History

Doc.
No. Dates Description
1 Filed & Entered: 07/07/2009
Voluntary Petition (Chapter 7)
4 Filed: 07/07/2009
Entered: 07/09/2009
Set Deficient Filing Deadlines
-- Filed & Entered: 07/08/2009
Add Judge
-- Filed & Entered: 07/08/2009
Add Trustee
2 Filed & Entered: 07/08/2009
Declaration Re: Electronic Filing
3 Filed & Entered: 07/08/2009
Statement of Social Security Number(s)
5 Filed & Entered: 07/09/2009
Incomplete and/or Deficient Filing-Ch 7 Non-Individual (BNC)
6 Filed & Entered: 07/10/2009
Auto-docket of credit card
7 Filed & Entered: 07/11/2009
BNC Certificate of Mailing
8 Filed & Entered: 07/13/2009
Meeting of Creditors Chapter 7 No Asset Non-Individual (BNC)
9 Filed & Entered: 07/14/2009
Notice of Appearance and Request for Notice
10 Filed & Entered: 07/15/2009
Notice of Appearance and Request for Notice
11 Filed & Entered: 07/16/2009
Scheduling Conference
12 Filed & Entered: 07/16/2009
Certificate of Service
13 Filed & Entered: 07/16/2009
BNC Certificate of Mailing - Meeting of Creditors
14 Filed & Entered: 07/17/2009
Notice of Appearance and Request for Notice
15 Filed & Entered: 07/17/2009
Motion for Relief from Stay
16 Filed & Entered: 07/17/2009
Auto-docket of credit card
17 Filed & Entered: 07/17/2009
Motion for Order Shortening Time
18 Filed & Entered: 07/17/2009
Attorney Information Sheet


Consolidated Resorts Inc., a Las Vegas time-share developer with 14 resorts from Hawaii to Orlando, filed for bankruptcy-court protection on Tuesday.

The company filed under Chapter 7 of the U.S. bankruptcy code in federal bankruptcy court in Nevada. Chapter 7 allows an orderly liquidation. Consolidated estimated it had assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.

The bankruptcy filing won't affect the operation of Consolidated's resorts because they're owned by time-share owners and managed by companies that aren't part of the filing, Lenard Schwartzer, a lawyer for Consolidated, said. Consolidated owes GMAC Financial Services, the company's biggest creditor, more than $200 million, Mr. Schwartzer said.

Late last month, Consolidated abruptly let go its marketing and sales staff and turned away potential buyers. At the time, a spokesman said the company was closing amid a lending environment that "made it impossible to continue this company." The "warehouse" lines of credit that Consolidated used to make loans to customers come due this fall, and lenders led by GMAC have refused to extend them, Mr. Schwartzer said.

A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. real-estate private-equity fund bought Consolidated in 2007. Goldman and GMAC declined to comment.

2/11/2009

Couple sues Consolidated Resorts, Tahiti Village, Desert Club for elder abuse, exploitation, Posted by Robert Paisola

DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST CONSOLIDATED RESORTS AND TAHITI VILLAGE

Two purchasers of Las Vegas vacation timeshare properties say they were victimized by dishonest sales tactics and are taking the timeshare companies to court.

Las Vegas attorney Barry Levinson last month filed separate lawsuits over the deals involving timeshare operators Consolidated Resorts Inc. and Summer Bay Resorts.

In one suit, a Nye County couple claims they were exploited in violation of Nevada’s Elder Abuse law.

Robert and Ellen Gooden claim personnel at Summer Bay Resorts were supposed to be helping them sell their interest in a timeshare condominium project, but then tricked them into buying another project they had no interest in.

Summer Bay operates the Desert Club timeshare project in Las Vegas.

"While in the process of signing the necessary paperwork to effectuate the sale of plaintiffs’ interest in the subject condominium project, an employee of the ... defendants slipped in papers unbeknownst to plaintiffs which consisted of a purchase agreement for the acquisition of additional property," the lawsuit alleges.

The suit says the Goodens didn’t know they had agreed to buy another property until they received a credit card receipt in the mail noting the purchase; and they say they had been asked to buy the subject property a year earlier at a lower price but were not interested in it.

The plaintiffs say they were the victims of fraud, deceptive trade practices and were not advised of their right to rescind the deal until it went into effect.

The couple, who were ages 60 and 67 at the time of the transaction, also allege Desert Club and Summer Bay Resorts violated the state Elder Abuse law.

They say the sales person they were dealing with "took advantage of plaintiffs’ advanced age and lack of commercial sophistication to perpetuate an act of fraud." They say the defendants are liable for "damages for injuries suffered by older or vulnerable persons as a result of abuse, neglect or exploitation."

Officials with Summer Bay Resorts and Desert Club could not immediately be reached for comment.

***

The second case involves Consolidated Resorts, a Las Vegas company that operates Las Vegas timeshares Tahiti Village, Tahiti and Club de Soleil; along with timeshare resorts in Florida and Hawaii.

Timeshare buyer Phillip Ramos, who lives in Clark County, alleges in the lawsuit that the only reason he bought an interest in two timeshare condominiums in Las Vegas is because he was assured by a Consolidated official that he could transfer the times he had purchased for use at other timeshare locations, specifically in Hawaii.

But after buying an interest in the Las Vegas timeshares, Ramos was told there was a lack of availability of timeshare locations in his desired travel destination of Hawaii.

The complaint alleges breach of contract, fraud and the use of deceptive trade practices by Consolidated. The suit also claims Ramos was not advised of his right to rescind the contract and did not discover the alleged misrepresentations until after the contract took effect.

Consolidated Resorts has not yet responded to the allegations and its policy is not to comment on litigation.

***

Separately, a lawsuit pitting the Palazzo resort on the Las Vegas Strip against Consolidated has been quietly dropped.

The parent companies of the Palazzo and its shopping mall, the Shoppes at the Palazzo, filed suit last month in Clark County District Court against Consolidated, claiming it failed to open marketing booths at the Palazzo resort and owed the Palazzo millions of dollars in rent.

Attorneys for the Palazzo moved Jan. 14, six days after the suit was filed, to have it dismissed. There was no explanation for the dismissal and officials with both companies have declined to comment on the suit.

Steve Green, Wed, Feb 11, 2009 (2 a.m.)

12/14/2008

A Quick Tahiti Village On Site LIVE Review, By Robert Paisola, CEO The Time Share Chronicles

For Immediate Release
December 4, 2008
Western Capital Investigations
The Timeshare Chronicles
For Release to International Media via PRWEB.COM and CNN I Report
A Tahiti Village On Site LIVE Review, By Robert Paisola, CEO The Time Share Chronicles

WHY IS THIS MANAGER, CARL WALDEN, OF TAHITI VILLAGE HIDING HIS FACE? Find Out Why!

How do you get to Tahiti Village ? In a Mini Bus!

YOU WANT REAL PRICING FACTS ON TAHITI VILLAGE? WE HAVE FACTS!


You Want More Pricing Details? We have it All!


VERY VERY IMPORTANT CONSOLIDATED RESORTS VIP AUDIT UPDATE!

IF YOU HAVE EVER HAD ANY DEALINGS WITH CONSOLIDATED RESORTS TAHITI VILLAGE PROPERTY IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, YOU WILL NEED TO READ OUR ENTIRE REVIEW OF THE 5 HOUR VISIT THAT WE MADE TO THE TAHITI VILLAGE PROPERTY TODAY.

IF YOU HAVE BEEN HAVING PROBLEMS WITH CONSOLIDATED RESORTS OR TAHITI VILLAGE, THEN YOU WILL WANT TO READ OUR FULL REVIEW, WHICH IS IN THE TRANSCRIPTION PROCESS.

HERE ARE SOME BASIC FACTS THAT WE HAVE LEARNED:

1. We have CONFIRMED that Consolidated Resorts, who is the parent company of TAHITI Village is being backed by an obscure unit of GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC, et sec:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s Whitehall real estate fund said it made a ``substantial'' investment in Consolidated Resorts Inc., the time-share resort developer owned by closely held ASNY Corp. of Las Vegas.

Terms weren't disclosed. The companies formed a joint venture called ASNY Holdings LLC that will be managed by Arthur Spector, ASNY's founder, chairman and chief executive officer, New York- based Goldman said in a statement distributed by Business Wire today.

``We expect to combine this platform with our extensive resources in Whitehall to continue to grow this business into what we believe will be a world leader in the vacation ownership industry,'' said Stuart Rothenberg, the Goldman managing director who heads the firm's principal real estate investing unit, in the statement.

Consolidated Resorts, founded in 1982, has developed vacation ownership properties in Maui, Las Vegas and Orlando and has projects in development in Palm Springs and Kauai. Some of ASNY's assets and non-timeshare assets owned by Spector aren't included in the new venture.

The investment was made by Goldman's Whitehall Street Global Real Estate LP 2007 fund.

This fact has not been brought to public light because of the massive customer service issues that have been occurring at Consolidated Resorts flagship property, Tahiti Village. We are flying to New York City for our VIP Clients to meet with Goldman Sachs to let them listen to the audio of what we were told.

2. WE HAVE CONFIRMED that there have been DOUBLE DEEDING of properties in an effort by management to present an ARTIFICIAL CAP on members who join the resorts. This data is presented in articles on this site and will be the subject of a much larger article.

3. IF YOU ARE GOING TO GO TO TAHITI VILLAGE IN LAS VEGAS,NEVADA IT IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL THAT YOU ONLY MEET WITH MR. BRETT OLSEN, ( Pictured below with Mr. Robert Paisola ) WHO IS A SENIOR SALES REPRESENTATIVE WHOM WE SPENT MANY HOURS WITH TODAY DISCUSSING THE TAHITI VILLAGE PROJECT and IS THE ONLY PERSON THAT WE CAN REFER YOU TO AT THE TIMESHARE CHRONICLES TO ENSURE THAT YOU DO NOT GET SCREWED.
ROBERT PAISOLA, THE CEO OF WESTERN CAPITAL AND BRETT OLSEN, THE ONLY PERSON YOU SHOULD TALK WITH... OR LEAVE! CALL HIM DIRECT AT 1-800-231-3111

4. LISTEN CAREFULLY!! STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM ANYONE ELSE, JUST SHOW UP, TELL THEM THAT YOU MUST SEE BRETT OLSEN AND REFUSE TO TALK TO ANY OTHER REPRESENTATIVE, ESPECIALLY THE CURRENT PROJECT MANAGER, Skip Cady.

We ARE NOT ENDORSING SKIP KADY, so DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME.

If you are in Las Vegas and you are reading this before you leave for your timeshare presentation, PRINT THIS OUT and take it with you. We have had long discussions with Brett and he is one of the only people we trust. HE WILL ASSIST YOU AND GIVE YOU DIRECTION. HE CAN EVEN GET ROBERT PAISOLA ON THE PHONE FROM INSIDE THE RESORT if you are needing additional direction.

5. There are HUNDREDS of Photos and LIVE AUDIO for you to listen to and watch. Hang in there, because now that we know that Goldman Sachs is involved, the game just got much bigger. There are many other issues going on inside the Consolidated Resorts Company that we will discuss, but the information will be closely guarded until the proper time.

My friends, this has been a VERY LONG day, and a visit to the Tahiti Village Resort is not merely a 2 hour event, but an ordeal. We will provide you with pricing, incentives, employee interviews, transcripts, Live Audio and Much More.

We are also going to contact Goldman Sachs about this investment and seek comment from not only Goldman, but the CEO of Consolidated Resorts, and The New Project Director Skip Kady. We are also in the process of presenting our evidence of DOUBLE DEEDING to the State of Nevada Department of Real Estate.

If you are having problems with Consolidated Resorts or Tahiti Village, watch the video at www.WesternCapitalVip.com and follow our steps as outlined. Also watch the VIP Video at www.WesternCapitalMD.com

Again, The ONLY PERSON that you should be talking to at this resort is Mr. Brett Olsen.

There is MUCH MUCH more to come, We just wanted to get this preliminary data to our International Audience ASAP.

For the TimeShareChronicles.com , this is Robert Paisola for CNN I Report, reporting LIVE from Las Vegas, Nevada on Consolidated Resorts and Tahiti Village. More Information will be broadcast on www.TahitiLawsuit.com

More To Come,

Robert Paisola
CEO
The Timeshare Chronicles
www.TimeshareChronicles.com

FOR MEDIA INQUIRIES
Contact Lisa Hall
1-877-517-9555
801-671-7843


11/07/2008

Consolidated Resorts- Tahiti Village Does it Again! Another VIP Client Gets Screwed! by Robert Paisola



Consolidated Resorts Does it Again! Another VIP Client Gets Screwed! Consolidated Resorts Attorney, Randy Richards, Responds! Attorney Lara E. Smith v Attorney Randy Richards!

VIP CLIENT FRED AND CONNIE ROSE OF FAYETTEVILLE GEORGIA TELL THEIR STORY TO ROBERT PAISOLA OF CNN I REPORT AND WESTERN CAPITAL

Dear Robert Paisola, CEO, Western Capital

Two years ago, 2006 my wife and I bought a timeshare from Consolidated Resorts in Las Vegas NV in their Phase 2. It was their deluxe unit, the Royal Tahitian 1 week yearly floating for $43000. We knew from the beginning that buying a timeshare was not a good investment. What my family and I was looking for was a good Relaxing Vacation property that we could use and enjoy. I work many hours and if I had a property to use, it would force me to take more vacations. Then in the years that we did not want to go to Vegas, we could exchange it in an area that we would like to go. That was the plan but now we find it just a pipe dream.

As part of our purchase they gave my wife and I the usual hardcore sales. They tell you that the whole process should only take 30 minutes; maybe a couple of hour’s if you buy. We ended up being there well over 5 hours and by the 5 hour we were hurray signing the paper work to get out of there. The Sales staff falsely promised that we could split up our unit into 2 units, rent one and use the other or just use it 2 weeks out of the year. We could also split our weeks up 4 and 3 days if we choose. This was confirmed with the sales manager. They stated that we could get the rooms for $77 dollars a night if we use all our time or if we wanted a weekend getaway. This was a selling point for me because I was scheduled to go to Nevada on business. Plus they intentionally mislead us by telling us that we could refinance it because it was a deeded property. They ALSO gave us 6 free vacations which we have found out to be totally worthless. They give you 40 destinations to choose from, but when you try registering, they mail you a letter saying, 'we will contact you 30 days before your trip to let you know if it is available. ‘HOW CAN YOU PLAN A TRIP THAT WAY?? When you call, they refuse to speak to you before your time to hear from them. I read that these trips end up costing you a $1000, but I would not know because, NO ONE WILL SPEAK TO ME!!

We purchase the floating and the more expensive unit thinking that it would give us a higher rating to get the weeks and days that we want. When we purchased the property in Phase 2 we were told that we could start using our time immediately in Phase One. Since then we have not been able to use it once. Every week we have chosen, has not been available. We have also found out that if we can not get a date locked in, we can not exchange it for a location or rent it. Consolidated Resorts then came back and said we needed to pay “Additional Fees” and the Maintains fees for Phase 1 if we want to use it because our contract was for Phase 2. We paid all the fees only to be told that nothing was available. So now we have been paying maintains fees on a property that is not yet built and only to find out nothing was available. I tried to dispute this but finally gave in. Customer service is horrible. When I tried to call to complain, I was constantly transferred to someone who barely knows what is going on. This is easily the worst decision I have made in my life.

In August of 2007 we put the unit up for sale. After I put it on the market I started investigating Consolidated resorts and found out that selling it is not an option because there are so many of them for sale. I paid out over $800 dollar to other scammers that said they could sell it and all they did was to take my money. If Consolidated / Tahiti Resorts are such a GREAT place, why is the market FLOODED with their units for Sale.

April 2008 I decided to really start researching and get this property sold. My investigation uncovered that Consolidated Resorts was scamming people for lack of better words and issuing false deeds. I have now STOP all payment per my lawyer. Our lawyer wrote a letter to Consolidate terminating the contract for unfair Business practices and fraud, false Deeds. I want out of this contract with a full reimbursement of all funds paid and I also want to make sure my credit is not hurt over this.

Below I am going to list all the unfair practices, supporting testimony and false deed information.

Unfair or Illegal Business Practices.

1. Sales personal misrepresented property.
A. Deeded timeshare property can be refinanced as any other home or property. This was a total lie. I have contacted several lending companies and none would finance it. This was an important item because of the interest rate that we were being charged, 16%.
B. Time share could be rented out. This maybe true but if you can not reserve a week per the contract, how would you rent it out? After 2 years of ownership we have not been able to use it once or lock in a single week.
C. Split weeks into 3 or 4 day segments. The contract states that this could be done but when we called and requested it Consolidated said NO.
D. Split Time share into 2 units and use separately. One of the main reasons to purchase the larger unit was because it had a lock out and we were told that we could split it into 2 units and use it 2 weeks a year. When I requested this, I was told that this could not be done.
E. Phase 2 owners could use Phase 1 with no problems. This was not true. When I contacted them they told me we would have to pay the maintains fees and an additional fee to use phase 1. We did only to be told that nothing was available. So now we have been paying maintains fees for 2 years for a phase 1 that we can not use and phase 2 that is not even built yet.

F. Free trips. As part of the package were given six free trips. After receiving all the information a couple months later we learned that there was major restricts and we could not book more than 30 days in advance before your trip to let you know if it is available.' HOW CAN YOU PLANE A TRIP THAT WAY?? Plus you had to use their travel company for all additional items. If we wanted to book additional people, our 2 children the cost of the vacation would go to more than I could book the same vacation for all 4 would be. I was told that adding the kids would be minimal. Another example is they would give us free accommodations but we would have to book airfare through their agents, the airfare was double what other travel company wanted.

G. Phase 2 completion date. The contract states that it should be completed in September 2007. I have just received noticed that the Grand opening is in August 2008.

2. Sales personal used unethical business practices
A. Sales presentation misrepresented the product
B. Sales presentation misrepresented the service
C. Sales presentation used dishonest sales practices
D. Sales presentation not consistent with the written agreement
E. Sales presentation did not disclose key conditions of the offer

DEED – Fraud.


Consolidated Tahiti Village Resort is a DEEDED Timeshare. My contract with Consolidated clearly states that we purchased into Phase 2 Parcel number 177-04-401-010. This is also recorded at Clark County NV Recorder website. Instrument ID: 20060504-01804 and 20060504-01803. I do not fully understand why there are 2 deeds for me on this property, but if you look at them Soleil LV and my wife and I are reversed parties. On September 2, 2008 I contact Carroll at the Chicago Title company, (760) 746-9904 to investigate this issue. As of Sept 8, I have not heard anything back yet.

Here is the link.

http://recorder.co.clark.nv.us/extReal/Navigate.asp?CrossRefSearch.x=34&CrossRefSearch.y=11


If you look up that parcel on the Clark county Assessor’s page you will find that parcel number 177-04-401-010 is NOT part of the Phase 2 construction. According to the Clark County Assessor’s page Phase 2 is 17704414000. See link.

http://gisgate.co.clark.nv.us/openweb/asp/openweb.asp?getParcel=17704401010

http://www.accessclarkcounty.com/assr_maps/map177044.pdf

Looking at the above link it is quite clear that Consolidated Resorts is doing something questionable. And because of this item I feel that it is within my rights to terminate the contract and demand a full refund.

Requested amount refund


Deposit $ 4,399.00
Principle + interest
684.45 X 24 months. $16426.80
Maintains Fee’s
598 x 2 ½ years $ 1495.00

TOTAL $22320.80


Total purchase was for 43000. I still own roughly 35000.


Supporting information

When I purchased this timeshare I felt that I had paid too much but if it had given everything that it had promised I would have been ok with it. In the beginning when I tried to use the property I did not record or document the exact times and dates that I tried to make arrangements. So I can not supply that type of supporting documentation.

What I can supply is links to other people and sites that show Consolidated Resorts has a history of scamming people and deed issues. I have also started contacting other Owners and the stories are the same. I suspect that once other owners investigate their deeds they will find the similar kinds of issues.

Ripoff Report. Com - This Website shows other people with the same issues.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/376/ripoff0376614.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/317/RipOff0317255.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/223/RipOff0223246.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/331/RipOff0331258.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/324/RipOff0324626.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/335/RipOff0335427.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/334/RipOff0334622.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/315/RipOff0315176.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/337/RipOff0337493.htm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/366/ripoff0366286.htm - This one is mine.

AllExpets.com – This is where YOU are the master expert! People in the same situation with the same company. In the older complaints this site mentions stop paying, that this place is a scam but in the more resent they are taking a different attitude. Please read all to see what I mean.

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Time-Shares-1843/Tahiti-Village-SCAM-Las.htm

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Time-Shares-1843/Consolidated-Resorts-Tahiti-Village.htm

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Time-Shares-1843/2008/5/Tahiti-Village-Scam-2.htm

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Time-Shares-1843/2008/5/Tahiti-Village-Scam-1.htm

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Time-Shares-1843/2008/4/Tahiti-Village-Scam-Robert.htm

This one is where I learned about the parcel not being in Phase 2.
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Time-Shares-1843/Tahiti-Village-Consolidated-Resorts-1.htm


Link to Better Business Bureaus on Consolidated Resorts. 103 complaints in the last 36 months.

http://www.vegasbbb.org/rptrel.asp?bbbid=59528

The Time Share Chronicles – by Robert Paisola
http://timesharescamsupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/tahiti-village-continues-with-lies.html

http://timesharescamsupdate.blogspot.com/2008/04/tahiti-village-continues-with-lies.html

Conclusion

The basic fact is that this company used high pressure sales techniques and misrepresented the property. Then they issued questionable deeds. I have presented 16 people with very similar issues and I could find more given time.

Since I originally wrote this Consolidated Resort has responded back to my lawyer. They basically say that I have a contract and I need to pay them even if they have provided NO SERVICE per the contract.

We have now filed a complaint with the BBB and the FTC.

BBB sent this confirmation:
Your complaint has been received and routed to the following BBB: BBB of Southern Nevada, Inc. (Las Vegas, NV)
6040 S. Jones Blvd
Las Vegas, NV 89118-2619
Phone: (702)320-4500
Fax: (702)320-4560
Email: scampbell@vegasbbb.org
Web: www.vegasbbb.org

Please contact the BBB directly if you have questions about your complaint.

FTC sent this confirmation:

Complaint Submitted

Thank you for contacting the FTC. Your complaint has been entered into Consumer Sentinel, a secure online database available to thousands of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies worldwide. Your reference number is:20144929

I have also found out WHY there are no dates open to owners, Consolidate has been renting out the resort. This is in direct violation with the contract. Case is described in more detail at this link.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/337/RipOff0337493.htm

I feel that termination of this contract and a full refund of $22,320.80 are justifiable. I am also very concerned that this company will continue to ruin my credit and I want to know what action I can take against them to stop this.

ADDED Info

http://timesharescamsupdate.blogspot.com/2008/03/tahiti-village-never-ever-buy-from.html


http://paisolafacts.blogspot.com/2008/01/consolidated-resorts-tahiti-village.html

http://www.tahitilawsuit.com

http://www.consolidatedresortsblog.com


Time line –

2006

May 01 - Flew to Las Vegas as part of a free trip. Not so free, paid to have upgrade hotel and had to pay for airline. Hotel ended up being Circus Circus, not much of an upgrade.

May 02 – Went to supposedly 1 hour Vacation Club presentation. Asked lots of questions and was told a lots of lies, see statement. Ended up being there over 6 hrs and missing lunch. We were starving and raced through the paperwork to get out of there.

May 08 – Last day of 5 day cancel period. Knew we paid too much but if everything we were told was true, then ok. No reason at this time to believe that we had been lied too.

August 01 - Went to Consolidated Reservation page to reserve a week in November 2006. Requested to split my Royal Tahitian and use the Bora Bora. I was told that even though we purchased phase 2 we could us phase 1 with no issues.

August 04 – received notice that I could not use property because I was a phase 2 not a phase 1 owner. I do not remember exactly but I think that I called and talked to a reservation person.

August 07 – I email them about my frustration about not being able to use the property.

August 09 – Received a email from Karen Leggett reservations, telling me again that I can not use the property because I was phase 2 not phase 1, She gave me a number to caller at.

August 10 or so – I do not remember the exact date that I called and spoke to her directly. She told me that if I paid the maintenance fees for phase 1 I could use it, $215.00.

August 18 – The maintenance fee was credit to my account.

August 19 or so – I called Karen back and requested my dates, this time she told me nothing was available in a Royal Tahitian and that I could not split my property. I had to use exactly the type of unit that I bought. This was not what I was told at the sells presentation.

October 1 – Consolidated billed me for the Maintenance fees again, $598.00. I contacted them and told them that I was told that the maintenance fees would be do on the Anniversary date, May 02 of each year, plus I asked why am I being billed for maintenance fees for a building that was not built. This issue went back and forth for till May of 2007. Basically I was told that I was paying the maintenance fees for phase 1 so that I can use it and that the sales man was wrong on the date that they were do.


2007 –

February 02 – Because of the issues I was having I decided to try to sell it. The sales presentation stated that this was a very popular site and I could sell it very easy for what I owed or more. I found a company on the internet and paid them $400 dollars to sell the property. The company is Timeshare Adventures, Don Moore. To make a long story short, it never sold. The internet company ripped me off. I have email traffic, to support this.

May 20 or so – Consolidated and I agreed that I would pay the maintenance fees on my anniversary date and that I do not have to pay the late fees. This was done through several emails and phone calls. I did not record these phone calls or keep these emails because I did not really think that it would come to this.

June - First phase 2 was still not completed yet. I contacted reservation to reserve a unit to swap on Interval. I was told that I could not use the property because I had a late payment showing. I explained that the late payment had been waived by the billing department. Again I was told that I could not use the property because of it and I had to provide the emails that showed they waived the payment. Since I did not have this information I paid the fee on 07/06/07. Only to be told NOTHING was available.

June – Since I was having trouble reserving a unit, I decided that I would try to use the 6 free vacations. What a joke. We contacted the company and were told that we could not combine them; they didn’t cover everything and so on and so on. Basically these trips proved to be totally useless.

October – I received a bill for the Maintenance. This totally frustrated me and I sent a letter to Consolidated about them charging me again in November when we had agreed that it would be in May and why was I paying for Maintenance fees for a property that is still under construction. Or why am I paying maintenance for phase 1 when I could never use it. So I did not pay it.

2008 –

January or so – getting letters and calls. They started to threaten my credit this time because of my job/career I can not have any negative things on my credit. So I paid them on January 31. Again they said they would waive the late fee but they did not. This was the last straw for me.

February 24 – Hired a second company, BML Marketing to sale time share because the first company had done nothing. I paid $400 and nothing. Rip OFF.

March – getting calls and letters about $29 dollar late fee. Started to research Consolidated found all kinds of information on Ripoffreports.com and Allexperts.com.
Found out about the deed issue. That’s when I said enough is enough.


May – Contacted Lawyer. Lawyer advised that we stop paying them any money till this issue is resolved. He then requested that I, send him a written detail statement for him to review and then he will send out a letter. The lawyer advised that I do not speak to Consolidated on the phone or in writing. Let him handle all of it. I usually prefer to handle issues myself. But based on my past experience with this company I felt that what ever I said or did they would say what they needed to, to keep me paying.

May – Started posting on Ripoffreport.com and Allexperts.com

June – Stop paying – cancel credit cards. Send written statement to lawyer.

August – Lawyer sends letter to Consolidated. The lawyer said he had to do some research and validate some of my claims. That is why he took so long to contact Consolidated.

August – first part of September – I was trying to purchase some foreclosures for Rental property. The plan was to buy 1 property for $60K that appraised for $115K. Refi the house and pull out $40K ASAP. I would then take that $40K to buy 2 more houses. That was the plan. The deal fell through because my Credit report showed a 60 day late payment on a MORTGAGE. This killed my financing. I was told that Consolidated could not put anything negative on my credit while I was disputing it under the Fair Credit reporting Act. I do not know if this is totally true or not. I disputed the charge with the Credit bureaus saying that 1. This is not a mortgage, it is a vacation club. 2. I am legal dispute with the company because they never provided any service for the money. The credit bureaus came back and said I had a contract and it is going to stand.

September 02, checked credit score and file dispute.

September 03 – Because of the Credit issue, I started to search out other people to help. I found the “Owners Advocate” and hired them to help with this issue, $1000. So far I can not see anything positive coming out of the “Owners Advocate”. I have sent them all the same documents that I am sending you.

September 05 – Found the Carl Hardin, the Chief Operating Officer of Consolidated Resorts Email. Sent him an email stating how unhappy I was with his company.

September 06 – Mr. Hardin emailed me back and said he would get back to me by the following Tuesday or Wednesday. I never heard anything back.

September 08 – Received first letter from my attorney, Consolidated sent August 22. Basically states that they have a right to take us to court and sue us for all the cost.

September 09 – I filled a complaint with the BBB and the FTC.

September 14 – Sent Mr. Hardin an email following up. No response.

September 18 received letter from BBB and September 23 from Consolidated. I discussed the letters with the lawyer and basically my lawyer told me that unless I have more people or exact dates that I was denied service do to Consolidate renting out the units, there was not much else they could do.

September 21 – Sent Mr. Hardin another email following up. No response.

October – My lawyer did review the response letter that I wrote for the BBB. I sent it in on the October 19 and have not heard anything else from the BBB.

October 09 – Got a foreclosure letter from Consolidated. Faxed my response back to Consolidated and contact you. Consolidated has phoned and left messages but they have sent nothing else in writing. I have not spoken to them under the advice of the lawyer.

October 19 – Tried to be nice and professional with Mr. Hardin. He never got back to me as promised. Sent a final email stating that I am going to search out other owners and start a class Action lawsuit.

October 24. Finally got in contact with Robert Paisola - I know that I finally have a chance to resolve this and Robert Paisola has a solid track record of success of dealing with Tahiti Village and Consolidated Resorts! Thank God for Robert Paisola.

November 1. Received letter from my lawyer were Consolidated responded to my Fax. Consolidated wrote their response on October 27…

November 3 Received letter from Consolidated in response to my letter. Basically they can do what ever they want and I can’t say anything….



THEN I SPENT MONEY ON AN ATTORNEY, WHO DID THIS, AND YOU CAN SEE THE RESULTS!





Now Look At What Tahiti Village Consolidated Resorts Says from Attorney Randy Richards, whose data from The Nevada State Bar Association is:

Randy Richards
Status: Attorney Active
Company: Consolidated Resorts, Inc.
Address: 801 S. Rampart Blvd., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Phone Number (702) 939-5825
Fax Number: (702) 967-5189
EMail
Website
Admit Date 10/14/1998
Law School Brigham Young University
Bar Number 6794
Professional Liability Insurance Yes

















IF YOU ARE A VICTIM OF CONSOLIDATED RESORTS AND TAHITI VILLAGE THEN YOU MUST CONTACT ROBERT PAISOLA AND WESTERN CAPITAL NOW AT TAHITIVILLAGE@MYCOLLECTOR.COM AND ROBERT@ROBERTPAISOLA.COM

MANY MORE UPDATES TO COME LIVE FROM LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

9/17/2008

How to Nail Consolidated Resorts and Tahiti Village Right Between the Eye! By Robert Paisola


Editors Note: If you are having issues with a Time Share Company, contact Robert Paisola at www.RobertPaisola.com

THIS LETTER IS THE PROPERTY OF WESTERN CAPITAL AND ROBERT PAISOLA AND IS TO BE USED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

Robert Paisola is the leading Time Share Abuse Authority in the nation

April 12, 2008


Mr. Randy Richards, Associate General Counsel of Consolidated Resorts Inc.

801 South Rampart, Suite 200, Las Vegas, Nevada 89145


Re: (Name Delineated for Privacy) , Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX6, failures to up hold Consolidated Resorts, Inc NO Rental Program Policy within Agreements.


To Mr. Randy Richards,



This follow up letter is in regards to a conference telephone conversation with Mr. Randy Richards, Associate General Counsel of Consolidated Resorts, Inc of Las Vegas, Nevada and Mr. XXX and XX.

As requested by Mr. Richards, documentation has been gathered by Tahiti Village/ [former]Club De Soleil Time Share Owners Mr. X and XX [hereafter known as plaintiffs] to confirm that Consolidated Resorts, Inc. indeed does have a third party Internet Rental Partnership Program in conflict within its “Tahiti Village Plan Purchase’s Acknowledgment of Representations [1/104] [2].”

As stated by Consolidated Resorts, Inc in broad terms:

“Neither the Seller, the Sales Agent, nor the Manager [Plan Manger] has any form of rental or resale program…”[1] [Bold emphasized, also see Exhibit 1 “Tahiti Village Plan Purchase’s Acknowledgment of Representations [1/104], [2]”, pages 1 of 1].


Discovery Results

It appears well known Internet Hotel Rental Web Sites presently maintains a rental business relationship for profit with Tahiti Village, Club De Soleil and/or Consolidated Resorts Inc for many months, if not years


Furthermore the plaintiffs have also taped the conference telephone conversations during their conference phone inquiry with a Internet Rental Company in partnership with Consolidated Resorts Inc. This will assist in eliminating any further verbal or written semantic problems in plaintiff’s quest for a good faith settlement.



[a] Requested information from the Internet Companies by telephone and computer:

* Web Site Company Name and web site locator.
* Name of salesperson.
* Do you need to be a time share owner of Tahiti Village, etc?
* Whom do they do their bookings through? And/or
o Is there some type of rental partnership agreement?
* How are the reservations confirmed, [1-] by your company or another or [2-] Tahiti Village [Consolidated Resorts] directly?
* Hard copy of web site.





[1] First Internet Company: HOTELS.com

Contact: April 11, 2008@ 1230

Sales Person: David

Telephone Number: 1-866-629-1916



Information from web site- for Tahiti Village, NV:

As relayed by David to the plaintiff’s during a conference call “HOTELS.com works directly with the hotel reservations”, in this case Consolidated Resorts Inc reservations.[2]

* “There is No Tahiti Village or other Consolidated Resorts Inc. time-share ownership required…” There are NO ownership requirements or restrictions stated within the web site or from Consolidated Resorts, Inc to rent room[s].
* Furthermore David also stated that “… we make a lot of money for them…”


Single room, partial kitchen was $167, per night $567.81 with tax, for July 15 to 18, 2008. See Exhibit 2, pages 1-4.

Information for Club De Soleil: web site quote equaled the above room and price. See Exhibit 2, pages 4 of 4



[2] Second Internet Company: Expedia

Contact: April 11, 2008 @ 1330

Salesperson: Jake

Telephone Number: 1 800 551-2409



Information from Web Site - Tahiti Village:

* Expedia sales person Jake informed the plaintiffs that “NO time share ownership was needed” at Tahiti Village to register as a rental guest.
* Furthermore at plaintiff’s request the above ownership question was confirmed with a brief telephone call, immediately to Tahiti Village reservation desk by Jake.
* Furthermore Jake stated that “It would be less expensive if Expedia made the reservations.” See Exhibit 3, pages 1-2.



A verbal price was then quoted for July 15 to 18, 2008 for a price of $167, per night $567.81 with tax, single room.

Information for Club De Soleil: web site quote equaled the above room and price. See Exhibit 3, page 3.



As stated at “Expedia Picks” tab, Expedia “… has a preferred hotel partnership…” with the implied Seller or Legal Owner. See Exhibit 4 “Expedia Picks” page 1 of 1.



In Conclusion

Mr. Richards, as I understand, it appears you believe there is a semantics problem of your company’s NO rental program in your sales statements and agreements, as you have indicated on the phone and by letter.



Furthermore this inquiry by the plaintiffs is not a rescission of the contact under NRS 119A.410. But:

* Consolidated Resorts Inc misrepresented Sales Speech by your assigned agent and mangers pursuant to NRS 119A.130, stating on many occasions that “Consolidated Resorts Inc is not in the business of renting rooms” to time share owners and
* Furthermore continuing the same broad, misrepresented sales statement or act within your written agreement providing that your company is “Neither…” in the business of renting its Time Share Accommodations or will provide “… any form of rental… program.”, pursuant to NRS 150, 152, etc, outside of the ability by individual time share owners themselves. [3]




We further believe Sales Manager Mr. Brain Desrochers appears to be a continuation of this ‘Misrepresented NO company rental, sales tactic’, displaying ‘sincerity’ in showing how a person can successfully rent to make the “closing sales pitch”. But later not fulfilling their sales closing pitch promises to teach or share this information.



Though it appears to be, Mr. Desrochers is not the overall issue here.



IT has been made abundantly clear publicly, in your written agreements and letter that Consolidated Resorts Inc, in broad terms, does not or will not have in the future, any [as Internet, etc] rental programs.[4]





Genuine Facts



Fact 1

In your April 3, 2008 letter, page 2 par.5 it states “… Soleil [Consolidated Resorts Inc] does not engage in the business of timeshare rentals.” [Brackets added] See Exhibits 1 at [2] and 5 [April 3, 2008 Counsels letter, page 2, par 5.]

* This Consolidated rental statement has been established many times publicly verbally and in print by Consolidated, this is Not Disputed.
* The good faith of Consolidated stating that it does Not having a practicing rental program is Disputed by plaintiffs.





Fact 2

This “No Rental Policy Program” is shown to apply to all Consolidated entities throughout your letter and well understood, over the years, by all persons attending your introduction seminars and by new owners. See Exhibits 1 and 5.

* The No rental policy applicability to your company personnel is Not Disputed.
* The good faith application to affect this No rental policy by Consolidated and its personnel Is Disputed by plaintiffs.





Fact 3

The two Resorts Rental Internet Practice discovered on the Internet web sites are, so far, Expedia and Hotel.Com. See Exhibits 2-4. This is a Genuine Fact.





Fact 4

A combination of past and present accounting and tax records from all parties involved will show that Consolidated Resorts Inc has a practicing financial renting relationship and/or business partnership with the above well known rental or for hire Internet Companies. Factual

Fact 5

Credit card receipts for guest accommodations within the past five years will verify non-time share holders from its legal Consolidated time share holders. [5] Factual



Fact 6

The fact that non-time share holder who have rented have interrupt the time share availability at Consolidated Resorts for time share holders usage. Factual



Fact 7

Consolidated Resorts Inc business practice extends over US State lines. This is Not Disputed.



The only question left, “Is this an Intra and/or Interstate Business Trade Violation by sales misrepresentation under any State and/or Federal Laws?”[6]



The above is quite obvious! This moots any of your verbal or written concerns of semantics or Mr. Desrochers possible questionable sales behavior or your irregular rental practices.



This is a matter of a Bad Faith contract/agreement.



The rest of your letter has No Merit and will not be further considered by plaintiffs.



Therefore it is the overall Sales Time-Share Agreement-Contract and all monies expended in conjunction with the above findings that the plaintiff’s are NOW concerned with and contesting.



The lower monetary amount that is presently requested, in good faith, to end plaintiff’s time share obligations is Nineteen Thousand, Dollars, $19,000.00USdollars.



* Furthermore any reimbursement for any ground fees that are paid to Consolidated Resorts Inc hereafter.
* Finally any penalties privately or under State law, if any, within any original agreements that would be applied against plaintiff’s Sales Agreement Cancelation due to misrepresentation of the facts by Consolidated Resorts Inc or Seller will be mutually and legally voided.





Please let us keep this action as a one owner situation and good faith “Void Contact” settlement.

And not as an escalating State or Federal Class Action Suit, which may adversely affect your company… as this is not our intent.



Thank you for your prompt reply Mr. Richards.



Respectfully,

Mr. XX
Account Number: XXXXXX










Cc: , Consolidated Resorts Inc – sent by US Mail

Via US Certified Mail, Return Receipt will be Requested

April 30, 2008



Note: Physical Evidence by way of web pages were also sent as proof of Consolidates web-internet rental program.









Second Letter to Consolidated as requested per Consolidated.





Mr. Randy Richards, Associate General Counsel of Consolidated Resorts Inc.

801 South Rampart, Suite 200, Las Vegas, Nevada 89145



Re: Mr. XX, Account Number: XXX, failures to up hold Consolidated Resorts, Inc NO Rental Program Policy within Agreements.





To Mr. Randy Richards,



Thank you for answering my phone call on April 29, 2008.



I do understand that you will be seeking further advice on this matter.



Therefore the plaintiff’s have agreed, only for a very short time, to delay in seeking legal advice, etc and other time share holders having the same concerns.



Enough time has elapsed to consider both parties findings on its merits, in reflection of your own letter and Consolidated Resorts, Inc NO Rental Program Policy within Agreements.



After May 12th 2008;

* The change of $19K will rise to $36K or to your highest value as presented by your sales representation of this particular time share after May 12th 2008 and
* Hiring of an Attorney and
* Thereafter notifying other timeshare members, etc of our findings.



No reconsideration of the above will occur after May 12th, 2008, but will only increase monetarily and in complexity.



Respectfully,

Mr. XXX

Account Number: XXXXXXXX










Via US Certified Mail, Return Receipt will be requested.















Page 1 of 1

[1] The Seller to mean: Soleil LV, LLC / Consolidated Resorts, Inc of Las Vegas, Nevada, Consolidated Tahiti, Inc / Consolidated Orlando, Inc, as seen on the Credit Card Information [may also be referred to as “Consolidated” within this document.



[2] Telephone conference calls included Mr. Freemon, Ms Judy Backhouse [plaintiffs] and the Internet sales person. Consolidated Resorts Reservation Desk may also to in refer to as Tahiti Village or Club De Soleil Reservation Desk.

[3] As defined, NRS 119A.130 “Sales Agent”; NRS 119A.150 “Time Share Instrument”; NRS 119A.152 “Time Share Plan”.

[4] “Board terms” related to “Neither… has any rental programs.” to mean: to privately or publicly advertise or promote information within or part of any form or type of media to be understood as to express a desire to entreat or invite, whereas to hire or rent any properties or accommodations’ so named or equal to and/or as paid for within the plaintiff’s Club De Soleil or Tahiti Village Time Share Agreements, thereby avoiding engaging in a for profit rental program on behalf of and only for Consolidated Resorts, Inc. as per all contractual agreements.

[5] Non-time share holders as defined: are any person or persons that are not current property owners of a Consolidated-Tahiti Village and/or Club De Soleil time share as defined under Nevada Real Estate State laws and furthermore did not receive permission by a current time share owner to use their allot time as written per their Consolidated Time Share Agreement

.

[6] Exhibits 6 [one of many examples] show that Consolidated Resorts is directly competing against its renting Time Share Owners on the Internet. This is contrary to Consolidated NO rental program agreement by the Seller and Agents. The room prices given by Expedia and Hotel .Com above for 7 nights at $167.00 is approximately $1169.00 vs. Timeshare Owners averaged price is $1600.00, a difference of $431.00 in favor of Consolidated.

It is not the rental pricing listed and set by each individual owner that is at issue here. It is the very high premium which was paid up front and owner’s yearly dues to Consolidated to have exclusive rights as an advantage over or compared to the general public which has been damaged beyond repair. The owners do not financially benefit from the rental received by Consolidated, nor gain voting rights as a share holder would.






Consolidated replied with an offer to take as back to Club De Soleil. This of course does not resolve the rental issue in both sales pitch’s and in the “NO Rental Program” contract issue. Club De Soleil is also an older [first] project of Consolidated, which the services and the maintainace have become very sloppy.

The offer by us was declined by phone.



Thank you again.



Respectfully,

Mr. XXX

5/30/2008

Tahiti Village/Consolidated Resorts, Will it EVER end? Robert Paisola


Dear Robert Paisola,

I believe we are more innocent victims of Tahiti Village/Consolidated Resorts. We have been trying to go on vacation since January of this year and every where we turn Consolidated Resorts and their supposed affiliates throw up road blocks. Tahiti Village's representatives specified at the initial presentation that all they want is for there clients to have a wonderful vacation at hardly any cost, well all we have is costs everywhere we turn and still no vacation. We have a long list of services they told us we were entitled to, but at this point all they remain to be is lies.

Please, if you can help at all we would sincerely appreciate it.

Kathleen and Ray

Tahiti Village, Consolidated Resorts Scam Continues, by Robert Paisola


Mr. Robert Paisola

My husband and I are victims of the Tahiti Village, Consolidated Resorts time share scam. We subscumbed to the high pressure sale while on our honeymoon in Vegas. Upon our return, I got devestating news from my emloyer, I lost my job - buisness closed its doors- and therefore our income is now reduced by 50% ..we have been unable to make the remaining deposit payment to consolidated resorts, and we are now facing a pending lawsuit for the remaining balance on our contract of aprox $15,000 ( we have only paid $500 so far) We were told there is no way out of the contract, our five (calender ) days were used durring the vacation and travel, and included a Sunday- so were were unable to send certified revocation of contract letter in time to release us from the contract. (signed papers on a tuesday- flew back home friday, returned home at midnight, reviewed material on Sat- called but no service on weekends .. called Monday to learn we were screwed.)

Is there any hope for us, can someone help to expose this company for its high pressure, sneaky sales tactics and uncomprehensible binding contracts ? I feel we were mislead- the investment misrepresented, and the contract contains multitudes of fine print nearly incomprehensable, which when deciphered- are not details that were exlpained and presented to us at the time of sale.

Shouldnt there be a law to protect buyers in the event of a drastic change in financial or personal circumstances makes it impossible to fulfill the contract balance? We make about $21,000 a year now, single income -verses the combined estimated income of $50,000 we previously made... We are a family of three, soon to be four later this fall. Due to the change in income, we are already living on top ramen and pinching every penny to scrape by... we have no assets, not even a decent vehichle .. so the only way this company can get money from us is to garnish my husbands wages, which would put us into extreme poverty for who knows how long.
The has caused a myriad of problems for us as a newly married couple, and a second child on the way.. its the biggest mistake we have ever made. Im sorry we went to Vegas on our honeymoon.

We are looking at filing bankruptcy if we have to, there in no way we can live if my husbands wages are garnished... Its sad to consider, because we have otherwise good credit and not much outstanding debt... but what option do we have?

I aprecaite any advice you have to offer, and I apoligise for taking so much of your valuable time- I certianly apprecaite it,
Thank you ,

Audrey Stockham- Howell

5/08/2008

An Open Letter to Ken Molinaro, CEO of Playa Del Sol Resorts

Bryce LeBaron and Helen LeBaron
1190 Allgard Road
Qualicum Beach, B.C. V9K 2G4
May 8, 2008


Dear Mr. Robert Paisola;

As per our phone conversation a few minutes ago, I am attaching copies of two letters which I sent to Ken Molinaro outlining our utter disillusionment and unhappiness regarding our purchase of "timeshare" at Playa Del Sol Costa Sur in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. You may not be surprised to learn that neither Molinaro nor the PDS board of directors to whom a similar letter of complaint was sent by (registered) mail have ever given a word of response or acknowledgment to my letters. I am extremely pleased to hear you say that a class action lawsuit against PDS is anticipated in the not too distant future. Please be assured that we will be most desirous of joining in that action whenever it is launched. Thank you for your work in this regard.

Sincerely, Bryce and Helen LeBaron

Letter One

Bryce and Helen LeBaron
1190 Allgard Road
Qualicum Beach, B.C. V9K 2G4
February 6, 2008

Mr. Ken Molinaro, CEO
Playa Del Sol Resorts
5080 Shoreham Place, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92122

Dear Mr. Molinaro;

We sent you a letter dated November 8, 2007, but to date we have not had any response from either you or any of your staff. We are increasingly concerned about the lack of response to this previous letter and also to other communications by phone and letter to your customer service representatives and your board of directors regarding our great dissatisfaction around the issue of our PDS membership, and our inability to get reservations at Costa Sur, Puerto Vallarta, as we had been promised at the time of our purchase.
We currently are in contact with Mr. Robert Paisola and his Western Capital organization with reference to this matter, but before proceeding further into actions which would certainly prove detrimental to the PDS company image, it would greatly please us to resolve this matter promptly with you personally as requested in our previous letter. At the very least, it seems only good and ethical business practice to acknowledge receipt of our communications and address our concerns in some manner other than to simply ignore them. Will you kindly respond to us with some indication of your intent, what you are willing to do to give us a satisfactory resolution (cancellation of the contract and full refund of all monies paid to PDS Resorts).
It seems self evident that if the shoe were on your foot, if you had spent nearly $27,000 in good faith, expecting to be able to stay at Costa Sur (as promised) each year for several weeks, and instead had received nothing of value whatsoever, and indeed had been billed another maintenance fee for 2008 of $428, that you would be most unhappy. I remind you sir, that Mr. Joseph Potter, the PDS salesman at Costa Sur also promised us at the point of purchase, a rent back amount of $6,400 for each of the years 2007 and 2008. Clearly, since not a cent of that amount has been received by us to date, there was intentional misrepresentation (Downright Lying) and fraud on his part and through his agency by you and PDS Resorts. This is simply not acceptable behavior!

We look forward to an early response from you. Please do not disappoint us, sir.

Yours truly,



Bryce and Helen LeBaron PDS account #27693430
Phone (250) 752-8224


Letter Two

Bryce LeBaron
1190 Allgard Road
Qualicum Beach, B.C. V9k2G4
November 8, 2007


Mr. Ken Molinaro, CEO
Playa Del Sol Resorts
5080 Shoreham Place, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92122

Dear Mr. Molinaro;

On January 18, 2007 my wife and I were given a sales presentation at PDS Costa Sur by Mr. Joseph Potter, and we decided to purchase a two bedroom, triple lockout, one primary week and one award week membership. We were given 50 “breakaway” weeks as part of the deal. We made it clear to Mr. Potter at that time that we were interested only in staying at Costa Sur in the future, not in any other hotels or locations in the PDS system. We additionally made it clear that we wished to use our membership only during January and the first half of February each year in the future. Mr. Potter told us that we could use any number of our breakaway weeks for this purpose until they were all used up; that in the meantime we could lease back to the PDS company our primary and award weeks plus one breakaway week on an annual basis for the next two years at the rate of $6,400 per annum to help us pay for the initial membership cost beginning with the year 2007. Mr. Potter guaranteed to us that we were leasing back on these terms for the next two years, 2007 and 2008.

At the time of making this deal, we asked him for those terms in writing and he informed us that they would be provided in a membership packet which would come to us by courier after our return home to Canada. We asked him to him to help us secure our reservations for the year 2008, and he said that we could not do this until after receipt of our membership package and our ID number. He gave us the date of February 28, 2007 as the day on which this packet would be delivered to us with the assurance that we could make our 2008 reservations for Costa Sur at that time.

The packet did not arrive on February 28, nor has it ever arrived to date. However, a bill for $428.00 for 2997 maintenance fee was waiting for us upon our arrival home, and after several telephone conversations with a Ms. Jamie LaRue and Mr. Potter in late February, we sent PDS a check for that amount, on the assurance by Mr. Potter that it, the 2007 maintenance fee, is fully refundable at the beginning of 2008, since we have agreed to lease back our weeks for the year; all this in spite of the fact that Ms. LaRue stated to me that PDS shows no record of any leaseback agreement.

In late February, I called on the reservations phone line to ask for reservations at Cost Sur for Jan/Feb 2008, and was informed by the agent there that she had not received the 2008 reservations calendar so it was impossible to book time, but to call back about the middle of March. On or about March 15, I called again and spoke to a man named Britt who informed me that Costa Sur is completely booked up already for January and February 2008, and that it is impossible for us to stay there during that time. He also told me that breakaway weeks cannot be used for February bookings. I see in our contract that it states that there are space availability restrictions for Award weeks, but I so far have failed to find any restriction regarding the use of breakaway weeks during those months.

Regarding the restrictions on Award weeks; in truth, after nearly eight hours of negotiations with Mr. Potter, we were so tired that we failed to catch that clause, or to realize that it seriously impacted the possibility of our future use as we had stated to him. He, in his very charming manner continued to assure us that there was nothing to be concerned about and that we would be very happy with our ability to come to stay at Costa Sur during Jan/Feb each year. As it now stands, we are extremely unhappy and frustrated with the situation, since we have paid to your company in excess of $26,000 and so far have not been able to access any of the benefits that were promised to us. During the months of March through July of this year I have called several times to the PDS customer service center in Santa Rosa, CA to attempt to get some help towards resolving our concerns. No one has really offered anything other than to suggest that we try; to get alternate bookings at different locations through Interval International. That is most definitely NOT an acceptable solution. Several months ago we sent a registered letter to the PDS board of directors outlining our unhappiness with this matter and requesting that they refund our monies paid back to us and void the contract, as there seems to be no way that we can expect to use what we thought we were purchasing. To date, there has been no acknowledgement of receipt of this letter although we know that it was received by the board.

Mr. Molinaro, if we go to a store and purchase an item which, upon trial at home proves to be unsatisfactory for any reason, we have only to return the item for a complete refund with few or no questions asked. This is the situation which we have here. We, in good faith, purchased a PDS membership which we were assured would fulfill our needs and desires to be able to stay at Costa Sur each year during January and the first half of February. Clearly this is not how things have worked out. We feel very badly about this and see no recourse now but for you to refund our money back and terminate our contract with PDS because it is not providing us with the services we were promised.

Our expenses to date are as follows:
Down payment $7,650.00 by VISA
RC 695.00 by VISA
Principal balance 17,850.00 by wire transfer
Maintenance fee (2007) 428.00 by check

Total $26,623.00

We urgently ask that you give our request immediate attention and that you please respond back to us by return mail, rather than to simply ignore this and do nothing as has happened thus far due to inaction by others in your organization. We request that you show good faith and ethical business practice towards us by settling this matter quickly.

Yours truly,




Bryce LeBaron
Acct. # 2769343

4/02/2008

WESTGATE RESORTS- THE VICTIMS LINE UP- ROBERT PAISOLA RESPONDS

Mr. Paisola,

thank you for taking the time to read this. I have spent the last few hrs reading alot of your replies. As I was just introduced to this website by another disgruntled timeshare owner.

You see, like most people I did most of my research on timeshare ownership after I bought mine. I purchased an every other yr starting 2010 a 1 bedroom at PH Towers in Vegas.

I paid 19k and after reading all these posts on this website I fell for the same tactics. I managed to give them as much as I can afford for a down payment (2k) and am financing the rest with them at 16% interest like 311 month for 15 yrs. Right now I'm managing to afford this, I just recently purchased in Jan 08. But after gaining knowledge, Why did I not know about buying on the resale market. What a bad financial move right???

How could I have not known I would only be able to get 20% of what I paid for, ESPECIALLY since i told my sales rep that the only reason I want to buy it, is so I can sell it in the near future and hope to make a nice profit because I believed PH Towers was different and unique and new construction and elegant and what not??? She just nodded her head and must have been thinking to herself "boy, this guy has no clue" How come there is no public awareness on this subject.

I read about some class action lawsuits I mean how can I get more info on that, is there someone really gonna file one against not only Westgate but others as well as they are all deceptive.

Anyways I just needed to vent a little bit after reading all these posts, Right now I'm managing to make the pmt but I am going to try and use it to my advantage I think. I mean being Westgate gold owner BS or whatever, I should be able to get good deals on trips, so maybe I can turn into a mini travel agency and advertise trips and charge them more money for what Westgate will give it to me for.

I realize there may not be any hope for me in selling this timeshare for a profit (eventhough I have it on ebay as we speak) so either I am going to have to enjoy it, use it, pay maint fees, but try to make the most of the situation by making money from some of its membership priveleges.

Do you have any advice for me as I'm sure there are many of us timeshare owners out there who could use some.

Thanks alot, Pat

Tahiti Village Continues with Lies, Scams and More Victims, Robert Paisola Reports

Mr. Paisola,

I have read the letters from other frustrated timeshare owners and I wonder is there a class action law suit for Consolidated Resort, Tahiti Village? I was lied to, and I felt forced into purchasing the timeshare. During the time the sales man, Brad Quenemoen, insisted we purchase a unit a Tahiti Village, my husband and I was against it. Then Mr. Quenemoen got the staff manager, Michael Dorantes, to come over and help him sale us a unit. My husband and I received Mr. Dorantes’s home and cell number for assurance that we were in good hands.

Please let me know if there is a chance that Consolidated Resorts are not doing business fair. I still am not aware of my financial company’s information. My interest rate is 16.5% and that is very high, but Consolidated Resorts is not my finance company, GMAC is but, they do not have a record of me. What are my rights as a consumer? I am being taken advantage of.

I have not had a job and I have not been able to pay Consolidated Resorts, so now I have gotten a letter for summons and civil complaint that might be filed with the court if I don’t contact them with payment. This is strong arm. Please is there anything you can help me with?

Thank you,


Betty

3/27/2008

Consolidated Resorts Scams Fox News Media Anchor, Robert Paisola Investigates

Dear Mr. Paisola,

I hope you can help me.

5 years ago, my husband and I got roped into buying a timeshare from Consolidated Resorts (Tahiti-Las Vegas) through many misrepresentations and high-pressured sales.

They threw in all kinds of extra incentives including 5 FREE TRIPS to our choice of locations worldwide. The catch - we had to buy the airfare THROUGH THEM - which cost more than the actual trips, we would later find out.

We bought a 1-bedroom, every other year for $8,995.

After we agreed on a price, they said they need a down payment of more than $2,000. We paid it.

2 days later we got cold feet and called and asked to cancel the sale. They said the person we had to talk to was not in but someone would call us back. No on called and when we called again once we returned home they said it was too late.

We financed it for 14.9 percent - BUT our sales people swore up and down that since this is a deeded property that we own, we can refinance through our own bank for a lower interest rate. Our bank, of course said no, since they have no recourse to repossess.

So, we have been paying our $160/month for 5 years... thinking we must be paid off soon, we called to check on our balance (we never get any statements) and they said we still owe $4,952. I asked how that is possible and they "mentioned" the $1.98 finance charge - PER DAY!!!! We have been paying $60 per month for finance charges per month on top of the interest!!!! They NEVER mentioned this as we would have never agreed.

And, they claim we owed $8,995 AFTER the down payment. This was NOT our original agreement.

I am beyond sick over this entire thing.

By the way, we have NEVER spent even a single night at Tahiti. The thought of it makes me want to cry. We also pay nearly $200 in maintenance fees every year.

Can you please offer advice as to what we can do???

I have lost more than a few nights sleep over this and I just want out.

Thanks,

JULIE

2/07/2008

Tahiti Resorts Scams Again! By Robert Paisola

Greetings Robert,

I greatly appreciate your assistance regarding this legal situation. As per our brief discussion Wednesday afternoon, I had contacted C. Resorts yesterday. The first person (female) I spoke with wanted to know our position in this matter. I said we were going to be represented by Robert Paisola. I asked her if she knew who he was, she said no, however connected me immediately to their legal attorney "Mr. Randy Richards" I spoke politely and again stated I would be represented by you. He had no comment, and I said I'm sure the two of you, will come to a mutual settlement. He again had little if anything to say, although I know my phone call was being recorded for quality assurance. I of course could try to tape the same call and ask their permission to do so, but I'm sure that request would be flatly denied. I will talk to you soon, and my prayers go out to your family members involved in that horrific sea disaster.

Best Regards,

Glenn